<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spam from corporate communications?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netjmc.com/intranet-management/spam-from-corporate-communications/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netjmc.com/practical-how-to/spam-from-corporate-communications</link>
	<description>Digital Workplace Strategy &#38; Governance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 12:48:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane McConnell</title>
		<link>http://netjmc.com/practical-how-to/spam-from-corporate-communications/comment-page-1#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane McConnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wntr.org/tempjmc/2008/03/spam-from-corporate-communications/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment Alain. Very nice to hear from you and hope to be back to Montréal one day not too far in the future!
I agree with you, and do the same myself.
But, I do not believe this is typical behavior - I think it&#039;s mainly from &quot;sophisticated&quot; or shall we say &quot;jaded&quot; (been there, done that) internet users?
One of my 2008 survey participants did this. I got notification he had &quot;deleted without reading&quot; my 2009 invitation. I dropped him a line to apologize for the unsolicited email invitation I had sent him, and he clarified that he had read it, did not consider it &quot;unsolicited&quot; and was joining the survey for a second year. By the way, he&#039;s the intranet manager in one of the most advanced intranets in the world - so just goes to show - you can&#039;t judge a person by the email they delete!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Alain. Very nice to hear from you and hope to be back to Montréal one day not too far in the future!<br />
I agree with you, and do the same myself.<br />
But, I do not believe this is typical behavior &#8211; I think it&#8217;s mainly from &#8220;sophisticated&#8221; or shall we say &#8220;jaded&#8221; (been there, done that) internet users?<br />
One of my 2008 survey participants did this. I got notification he had &#8220;deleted without reading&#8221; my 2009 invitation. I dropped him a line to apologize for the unsolicited email invitation I had sent him, and he clarified that he had read it, did not consider it &#8220;unsolicited&#8221; and was joining the survey for a second year. By the way, he&#8217;s the intranet manager in one of the most advanced intranets in the world &#8211; so just goes to show &#8211; you can&#8217;t judge a person by the email they delete!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain Savard</title>
		<link>http://netjmc.com/practical-how-to/spam-from-corporate-communications/comment-page-1#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain Savard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wntr.org/tempjmc/2008/03/spam-from-corporate-communications/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>&quot;deleted without being read emails&quot; does not alway mean that the email was not read. I have the &quot;reading pane&quot; always opened and I read those emails then delete them.
Alain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;deleted without being read emails&#8221; does not alway mean that the email was not read. I have the &#8220;reading pane&#8221; always opened and I read those emails then delete them.<br />
Alain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Column Two</title>
		<link>http://netjmc.com/practical-how-to/spam-from-corporate-communications/comment-page-1#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Column Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wntr.org/tempjmc/2008/03/spam-from-corporate-communications/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Spam from corporate communications?&lt;/strong&gt;

Jane McConnell has posted an interesting observation on &quot;spam from corporate communications&quot;. To quote: This is the second firsthand anecdote I have heard recently where intranet users have complained about &quot;spam from corporate communications&quot;. In the ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Spam from corporate communications?</strong></p>
<p>Jane McConnell has posted an interesting observation on &#8220;spam from corporate communications&#8221;. To quote: This is the second firsthand anecdote I have heard recently where intranet users have complained about &#8220;spam from corporate communications&#8221;. In the &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://netjmc.com/practical-how-to/spam-from-corporate-communications/comment-page-1#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wntr.org/tempjmc/2008/03/spam-from-corporate-communications/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>I love so much this one :-)that I have written  about it in B-rent
http://b-r-ent.com/news/communinaction-interne-ou-spam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love so much this one <img src='http://netjmc.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> that I have written  about it in B-rent<br />
<a href="http://b-r-ent.com/news/communinaction-interne-ou-spam" rel="nofollow">http://b-r-ent.com/news/communinaction-interne-ou-spam</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: netjmc.com @ 2012-05-21 12:39:49 -->
